Tuesday 28 May 2019

PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES

PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES.
This is a respectable sect, not so much for its humility, spirituality,
and piety, as for its number, wealth and learning. It has about 170,000
members. Several churches, originally Congregational, have merged
into Presbytcrianism, The Congregational clergy in England, fraternize
with those of this church in America, indeed, the only real
difference between these two sects is in their church government·
The Congregational, until about 1809, was the established faith
and order of New England, and like the Presbyterian, and its sister
churches, Holland and Geneva, equally an inheritor of the unmerciful
spirit of John Calvin. Religious hypocrisy became a passport to
civil offices, under the "divine influence" of Connecticut Calvinism.
No one was permitted to hold an olFice who was not sound in the faith:
no dissenter from Calvinism, the established faith of that dominion,
was allowed to vote for civil officers; if a ^erton turned Quaker, he
was to be banished, and if he returned, to suffer death; no hospitality
was to bo shown towards a heretic; no Catholic Priest was to abide
in the colony, on pain of death, &c. See Blue Laws of Connecticut·
Every Dissenter, down to the year 1811, was compelled to support
the clergy man of the Parish, whether he approved him or not. The
General Court of Massachusetts passed a law against the Baptists»
in 1651, inflicting banishment on them, if they persisted in dissominating
their doctrines. In 1557, they cut the ears and bored the
tongues of the Quakers who became obnoxious to them, with a red
hot iron; and in 1656, put four to death for rofusing to leave tho state·
The Presbyterian church, like its Scottish parent, is not deHcientin
worldly policy, and, opportunity fitting, is not backward in offering
incense to those in power. However fair to tho eye this daughter of
Babylon may appear, decked with all her trappings of a learned
priesthood, colleges, professors, gaudy temples, benevolent societies,
wealthy and fashionable flocks—she has the elements of discord, the
seeds of dissolution rankling in her body: and, judging lrom the

avowed misgivings of her adherents, the e?e of an explosion teem·
near at hand. Calvinism, Anninianism *nd the Creed are the
conflicting elements in this, as in all other religious establishments;
and an approaching convention at Pittsburgh threatens to shiver into
contending factions, this "pure faith, primitive order," and * peculiar
theology!»
There are other sects of this church, concerning which we need not
enter into detail· It will be sufficient to lay their names before the
reader, who can make further inquiry respecting them, as his leisure
Or cariosity may prompt· Their names are as follow:
Relief Presbyterians, 1752; Dutch Reformed Church, U. 8.
1639; German Reformed Church, U. S. 1746; Cumberland Pres*
byttrians, 1810; Irvingites, 1833.

NEW INDEPENDENTS

GLA8SITES OR SANDEMANIANS.
This sect observed the weekly administration of the Lord's Supper;
the weekly collection before tho Lords Supper for the support of the
poor, ayd defraying other expenses, mutual exhortation, and a plurality
of elders* pastors, or bishops, in each church. In the choice of
these elders, want of learning and engagemeut in trade, were no
sufficient objection, if qualified according to the instructions given by
Paul to Timothy and Titus. In their discipline they **ere strict and
severe, and separated from all other religionists, who they conceived
dii not profess the simple truth, or walk in obedience to it. All
which is Scriptural and Apostolical and highly commendable. Nevertheless,
thef had tho mark of the Beast on their foreheads, which they
did not wash off. They were unbaplized baby sprinklers. Out of the
controversies between those professors and the established church
arose another sect about tho year 1797, called th

NEW INDEPENDENTS.
Messrs. R. & I. Haldane wero the chief originators of the societies
classed under this name. They were aided tty Messrs. innes, Aikman,
and Κ wing, clergymen of the national church: The Η aidants were
laymen and men of the most unbounded liberality, and primitive
self-denial. Robert Haldanc : old bis large estates and devoted his
fortune to the enlightenment of his countrymen from onef"end Of
Scotland to the other. Ho attacked the corruptions of the church,
and was more indebted to the government, than to the ecclesiastical
powcrf, that ho was not subjected to tbe rigor of the law for his nonconformity.
He educated several young men at his own expense,
and sent them forth as missionaries 10 attack the strong holds of Satan
Many oi% these arc in the United States, among the Baptists.
Robert Hdldane, after having convulsed the clergy on their thrones,
and having enlightened the minds of the people to a considerable
extent» at length becime a Christian by being immersed into the name
of Christ. AUo in 1797, the celebrated Mr. V\ ilberforce, surprised
the publ.c by appearing as a religious writer, in England, his work
was iiiMtled a "practical view of the prevailing religriou* system of
professed Christians, in the higher and middle classes in this country,
contrasted with real Christianity." He lived and died a Churchman,
notwithstanding his protest. The period we have now arrived at
coincides with the resurrection of the Witnesses, which took place at
the French revolution. The Bible Society was established at or about
this time, which, from its foundation, must have circulated some mil·-
lions of copies of the Testimony of the Apostles and Prophets,
Ihroueh all the nations of the earth. It will also be remarked that
from the breaking out to the termination of the war against the Two
Witnesses there was the bitterest opposition imaginabie to the circulation
of their testimony among the people; but at their resurrection
it became fashionable to patronize the Parent and Auxiliary Bible
Societies. This» is another incident confirmatory of my view of this
subject before treated of. All the sects that arose between 1685 and
1790, can have no pretensions to the character of Christian churches,
for during that period, the bodies of the Witnesses laid dead and unburied
in the street (Platea) of the city, which runs thrDugh the nations
of different languages. Many of the New Independents becamo
Christians, and by doing so added to the number of the witnesses for
the truth.
While Mr. Glass was strengthening his sreessron, some other divine?,
on different grounds, were meditating their retreat from the National
Church. They wished to reform the establishment, but rot succeeding,
they renounced their allegiance to the assembly, and formed now congregations.
Four of the olergy were suspended in 1733 and in 1740
debarred from aU clerical functions in the Kirk. The cliiof of thorn
was Ebenezer Erskine. Their disciples rapidly increased* and were
at length embodied under the generic denomination of
6ECEDERS.
The Scotch Burgess oath in a certain clause runs thus—UI profets
and allow with my heart the true religion presently professed within this
realm and authorized by the laics thereof. I it ill abide at and defend tht
sime to my hfet end, renouncing the Romish Η eh'β ion, called Ρ apis·
try." Whoever took this oath declared that he believed the National
25
Kirk was the true religion. One part, therefore, of the Seceders
refused to take it; the other contended it might be taken with a safe
conscience, as the religion of the State was still the true faith, though
many abuses had crept in. Each party adhered to its own opinions,
and» about the year 1747» split into two opposite and contending factions,
called
BURGHERS AND ANTI-BURGHERS.
^ The Anties are more numerous than their opponents. The pugnacity
of John Knox still flows in the veins of his disciples; for the Burgess
oath still keeps some of their congregations asunder even in this
Country, so remote and independent or the scene of action· The dis-
Ciplee of Scotch divinity and metaphysics in the United States, must
be considered as Seceders from the Church of Scotland, not from principle
or choice, but from necessity. The revolution it was which severed
them from the mother Kirk; a revolution originating in political,
more than religious, disputes. The first society of emigrant
Presbyterians, was constituted in 1700, thirty· three years before the
quarrel between the Erskines and General Assembly. Their first Presbytery
was formed in 1704. They continued to increase till 1788,
when this ecclesiastical body was consummated in the formation of
the General Assembly of the
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES.

T H E GENEVES Ε BRANCH OF T H E APOSTACY.

THE GENEVES Ε BRANCH OF THE APOSTACY.

While the credit and authority of tho Roman Pontiff were on the
docline in Germany, they received a mortal wound in Switzerland
from Uiric Zuingle. a canon of Zurich. He was a man of heioio intrepidity,
of an adventurous genius, and of an uncommon degree of
knowledge and penetration. He is said to have been much buperior
to Luther in learning, capacity and judgment; and Dr. Mosheim ad*
mite, that the spirit of revolt began to show itself in Zuingiius before
Luther came to an open rupture with Rome. r»s early as 1516, he
began to explain the Scriptures to Uic people, and to censure the errors
of Papalism The impious traffic of indulgences started Zuirtgle
into open rebellion against the Pope in Switzerland, as it afterwards
did Luther in Germany; and had Zuingiius enjoyod the patronage of
t'rinces and had so important a theatre of action, it is ptobab!e we
should have hea d more of the reformation of Zuingl us than of Luther
» Bernardino Samson, an Italian Mon-k,wa* the Pope's merchant
or agent in tho Cantons, for the sale of licenses to sin. Like ' e?zel
in Germany, he was very zealous in his master's business. But Zuingle,
in 1516, spoiled his craft, by exposing tho worthlessncss of his
spiritual wares. His steadiness, resolution and courage were crowned
with success, and tho Helvetic Cantons soon rejee cd and denied tho
doctrine of the Pope^a supremacy. Zuingle and Carlostadt, both
maintained that the bread and wine in the "JSactampnt" were nothing
else but bread and wine, appointed an emblems ol the body and blood
of Jesus: in opposition to Luther and the Pope. As these leaders
taught, so their disciples believed; hen^o it became an article of %faith.
From...the ye.ir 1524, this became the standard of orthodoxy in Switzerland,
The form of ^ trill-worship " established for the Swiss, by
Zuingiius, the founder of their religion, was remarkable for its eimplicity,
compared with other forms set up by other founders of new
religions.
21
THE CHURCH OF GENEVA,
or as it is romelttnes called, the Reformed Church, had scarcely been
established as the National religion by Zuingle, when the'Oirw/utfi
Hero," as he is termed.in 153U fell in a batile that was fought between
tho Protestants of Zurich, who drew the sword in defence of Zuinjglianisin,
and the subjects of the Pope, who threw away ihe scabbard
in the cause of Romanism. **lt was not, indeed, to perform," says
Mosheim. "the sanguinary office of a soldier, that Zuingle was present
at this engagement, but with a view to encourage and an,mate, by
his counsels and exhortations, tho val ant defender» of the t'roic*taot
Cause." And so much the worse. Who is tho greatest man slayer,
he that shed» the blood of five men with his his own hand, or he who
infuse courage into thousands to animate them in the slaughter of
their tens of thousands? It is the cause of Antichrist, under a new
and more disguised form, that needs rivulets of human bloc d to moisten
and cement its foundation and defences. Thus did the l.utheian,
English and Gcneve*e churches establsh themselves, by t-hc.dding the
blocd of their opponents. **/f any one slay trilh ihe suord ht shall
himself be slain ttith the sword. Rev. nii. 9. The d"om. therelore, of
the^e churches, founded by their "learned and pious" military apuslle*f
is unalterably fixed. "If any one has an ear Itt him hear."
Hitherto Zurich had bten the nursery of this religion; bx)l about
the year 1536* there appeared a champion on the sta^e, who gave a
new impulse to the tenets of Zuingle; and drew the attention of the
world from that Canton to the ci y of Geneva. This was no other
than the celebrated John Calvin, a native of Picardy, and by profession
a lawyer. His admirers have placed him at the head of the re*
formers, ait of whom he surpassed, at least in learning and parts,
as ho also did tha greater part of them in obstinacy, a*penly and iur*
bulence. Ί his **divine'' held an important post in that city. ts| ucially
in those remarkable times· Ho was made "professor of d trinity;" for
which ho was well qualified, having an incurable propt't sity to \ rv into
the eecrets. and, therefore, unrevealed counsels arid decrees of God·
His opinions are too «veil known to need description In 1541, he returned
to Geneva,from wti^nco his opponents had c.tprlic»! him. and
in fact, though not in name, became the Lord Bishop of the new c hurch
of Switzerland. He also obtained a high degree of influence in the
political administration of that republic; in attempting to acquire
which none of his disciples havo been backward, even to ι Ins day.
The fruits of this inflienre were fatally, felt by the unfortunate £er*
vetus. His views and project* were grand and extensive Th · Senate
of Geneva founded, a university in that city, at his requ^t, and
appointed him and Theodore Beza professors. This institution he
proposed to make the seminary of a!l the reformed rhur< hcs>; and
aimed at nothing less than rendering the government, discipline and
doctrine,of Geneva, the model and rule of strict imitation to all the
reformed churches in the wor'd. Geneva, then, and not JERUSALEM,
was to be the *Jtfolfiet of us all;" and the doctrine of Calvin, not the
Apostles' doctrine, tho model and rule of our imitation!! Ho died,
having accomplished his project in part, in I5G4, aged 55, much lamented
by his folio wore and friends.
The ecclesiastical government of this church and it· children is
Presbyterian. He restricted the power of the civil magistrate in
church affairs; put the clergy on aa equal footing; procured law· U

be enacted for the regulation of religions matters; all of which was
confirmed by a majority of the Senate. He contended for a real but
spiritual presence of Christ in the bread and wine, which Zuinnle did
not. The following churches constitute the chief of the progeny of
Geneva:—the Church of Heidelberg^ the Church of Bremen; alter the
HUGONOTS had finished their testimony, and virtually apostatized irom
the pacific principles of their ancestors, and the yet more sacred principles
of the ancient gospel they professed—they also wero adopted
into the family of Antichrist; and became confessors of John Caivin
instead of Jesus. The Belgic Provinces in 157 L, publicly adopted
Calvin's system* Since the United Provinces revolted from Spain»
the Calvinistic Belgic Church is better knowu as the Reformed Dutch»
or Church of Holland. The last church we shall notice of the Genevese
branch of the Apostacy is the Church of Scotland and its descendants.
The light of Christianity is said to have dawned upon Scotland during
the third century. There is nothing improbable in this assertion*
bat it is not built upon incontestible authority. While thus Kingdom
was», member of the Chureh_of Rome, the power of the Pope was
Tery great. It was sustained and seconded by inhuman laws and
barbarous executions, which choked, for many years, the seeds of roligious
liberty, which were sown very early in Scotland, by several
noblemen of that nation, who had resided in Germany during the re·
Kgious disputes that divided the empire. The vicus 01 the Romanist
clergy were excessive· [ndeed the character of the superstition and
priests of Rome, was of the same debasing kind in all the kingdoms
of Europe under tbeir yoke, prior to Luther's rebellion. The first and
most successful opponent of the Papal rule in Scotland, was John
Knox, a disciple of Calvin, and one who "never feaffed the face of man."
Hit» eloquence was persuasive, his fortitude invincible—he was the re·
tolute reformer of a fierce and barbarous people· He is sometimes
called the Apostle of Scotland; but the Apostle of Calvin in Scotland,
would be more appropriate. He set out from Geneva, among the
mountaineers of Switzerland, for the rugged but mere barien hills of
Caledonia, in L559; where he soon inspired the hardy Scots with α
violent aversion to the superstitions of Rome, so that the majority of
the Nation aimed at nothing less than the total extirpation ot Popery·
The indignation of the people was soon turned upon the persons and
offices of the Bi>hop*; «o thai the religious insurrection in this country
extended not only to doctrine, buf also to the government of the
Popish church. The faith and order, composing the religion which
John Knox introduced into Scotland, was well suited to the ruggedness
and barrenness of the country, to the coldness of the climate,
and to the barbarity and fierceness of the tempers of the people at that
time. It was the "peculiar theology" of Switzerland and the low
countries. The basis of its system was the fatalism of Antichrist,
and not very dissimilar to that of Mohammed and the Greek church.
Episcopacy was abolished, after the shedding- of blood on both sides,
and Presbyteries, Synods and General Assemblies, with the King for a
head instead of the Pope, were established in its room. From this
period to the present times, the gloomy doctrine, worship and discipline
of the churches of Geneva and Holland, established by the same
influence that consumed Servelus at the stake, have been upheld with
the most invincible obstinacy and zealt undex the imposing title of the
as
NATIONAL CHURCH OF SCOTLAND,
commonly called the Presbyterian Church, which was established by
law on its present basis, at the revolution in 16d#, when Episcopacy
breathed Us last and final breath in that realm. Let it be chronicled,
however, that the National church of Christ in Scotland, had recourse
to arms so late as Charles 11., to oppose an attempt to introduce certain
amendments or ''innovations ' into its discipline and worship!!
After witnessing a series of tho most dreadful convulsions and deplorable
scenes, John Knox, the founder of Presbyterianism, ended his
tumultuous career in the year 1572. During the Commonwealth, the
Scotch attempted to establish their religion in England, by "β solemn
league and covenant" formed with the republican malcontents of the
South. They fought and conquered. Presbyterian ism and the Westminster
confession of i'aith, gained the ascendant by force of arms;
but was again expelled and driven back into the regions of the North,
at the restoration of Royalty, 1662, leaving behind it only the shadow
of a name. Those wh » retain it have neither Presbyteries, Synods,
nor Assemblies; they still hold the endowments, though of Sccinian
principles, under the name of English Presbyterians. The climate of
England is too genial lor Scotch divinity. It is a remarkable fact, that
the strongest Calvinism is to be found in the coldest countries. Predestination
is nurtured in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Scotland. Hoi.
land, Switzerland, Germany, and the New England states; a southern
sun thaws its ice-cold frigidity into the milder and more benevolent
opinions of Arminius.
The Scottish daughter of Babylon remained entire until the year
1727; when an independent spirit, named John Glass laid the axe
nearly to the root of our genealogical tree, and denounced all national
churches as antichrLstian:—a position as true as the gospel. He was
a clergyman of the establishment. For this and other opinions he
was first suspended, and afterwards deposed for his contumacy, in
1730. The secession of Mr. Glass was continued by Robert Sandeman
in 1757, who was an Elder among the followers of Mr. Glass·
He maintained the forgiveness of sins by tho imputed righteousness
of Christ. If any act, exercise, or exertion of the mind, were necessary
to our being accepted of God, be conceived there would be
"whereof to glory." I his is Slcighism. The name given to this first
aud oldest of the Scottish sects is
GLA8SITES OR SANDEMANIANS.

METHODIST CHURCH

ENGLISH INDEPENDENTS AND THE AMERICAN CONGREGATION
A LISTS.
The founder of this sect was John Robertson, who raised the standard
of Independency or reformed Brownism, at Loyden, 1595. Hie
sect acquired the title by which they are designated, from their main·
tabling that every church is an independent society, and ought to be
governed by its own laws» independent of any foreign jurisdiction.
The first church of this name was established in England, A D. 1616.
Cromwell was very partial to this sect, and made use of it to keep
the Presbyterians, always an ambitious sect, in their proper sphere;
for be always disliked Presbyterian usurpation as be did Episcopal
tyranny· When Presbyterianism fell from heaven, at the restoration
of Royalty and Episcopacy, its sons formed a coalition with the Independents
in and about London, in 1691, under the name Untied
Brethren· About the Restoration, thny dropped the name of Independents
and assumed that of Congregational Brethren* and their re·
ligious assemblies Congregational Churches· The English Prcsbyte·
Hans, with whom they once united, are more properly Socinians or
UNITARIANS There is no important difference in doctrine between
the English and American Congregationalists, and the Scotch and
19
American Presbyterians; they all coincide with the "peculiar theology *
of the Geneveso reformer.
My design is not to write a history of the sects of Antichrist; bat
simply, to exhibit to my readers the curious transmutations the Mystery
of Iniquity has undergone in its different ramifications from the
Apostles' days; and this, too, in as concise a manner as possible, or
compatible with the subject. I shall, therefore, bring my narrative of
the English branch of the Aposlacy to a close, by observing that hundreds
of thousands of dissentients have weakened the power of the
National Ecclesiastical Despotism of England, by ranging themselves
under different leaders, who have successively unfuiled their standards
of revolt against Episcopacy. These are known as Quokfrs, Shaker*%
Universalists. and Deslruetwnists; Mystics* Muggletonians, and
Fifth Monarchy Men% Jlntinomians, Hyper and Hypo Calvinists* besides
many others too numerous to detail. These are all Puritans
under various names After 1662* they were called Nonconformists,
and subsequently Dissenters. One sect, however, is, numerically
speaking, of too much importance to be pretermitted, or simply named
without a notice. The sect to which 1 refer is the
WESLEYAN EPISCOPAL METHODIST CHURCH·
The infusion of Arian, Trinitarian, Socinian, Calvinistic, and
Arminian subtleties into the Church of Rome, some of them under
other names, mainly originated ail those "peculiar theologies" we have
noticed as the sects of Antichrist; as regards the characteristics of their
distinguishing doctrines, as they are termed. The seeds of that grand
defection from the religion of England, we are now considering:» were
sown in its establishment by Armimus, a disciple of Beza,in the year
1600. His tenets are arranged undercut heads, which were stated in
opposition to Ihefioc points of Calvinism, at the famous Synod of Dort
in 16 IB. The tender mercies of Calvinism, in Holland, caused Barneveltto
lose his head; and doomed Hugo Grolius to perpetual imprison·*
went. The fate of Servetus is well known. The articles of the Church
of England are Calvinistic; but her clergy chiefly Arminian. About
1729. the church, and indeed the whole Kingdom, were tending fast
to open infidelity; so much so that to sneer at religion was becoming
quite a fashionable thing. In 1735, the National religion sustained a
shock which convulsed it to ite foundations; for Armmianipm and Calvinism,
headed up in the persons of brothors Wesleys, and George
Whitfield, attacked tho apathy of the Church, and the degeneracy of
the ti nes with so much vigor, that a hue and cry was raised against
them throughout the land. The Wesleys contracted a serious turn of
mind, in the midst of Collegiate dissipation, by imbibing· the spirit and
sentiments of William Law. the celebrated Mystic. They came over
to Georgia, to impart the doctrine of saving grace; but with little effect.
These two "divines" were very enterprising, preaching and propagating
their opinions with great success; especially the doctrine of salvation
by faith alone. After porno time, Xhrfincpoinls divided Wesley
and Wit'afield; the latter setting up for Cahmislic Methodism, tho
former for Arminion, and so, like Lot and Abraham, tho one went to
the right and the other to the left*
The celebrity of Mr. Whitfield's opinions and piety, attracted the
attention of Selina, the Countess Dowager of Huntingdon, who
erected meeting houses, and a college, for the use of hie disciples.
The sect is well known in England as Lady Huntingdon's Connexion The first Methodist Episcopal church in the United States, was
formed in New York. 1766 Their clergy consists of Bishops. Presiding
Elders, Elders, Deacons and an unordained order of licensed preachers.
A schism has recently taken place in this body of religionists·; It may
be termed a revolt of the laity against the clergy, in which the people
determined to divide the authority with their imperious masters, in conformity
with the spirit of the age. Thoy organized themselves ml
Baltimore in 1630· under the name of
THE METHODIST PROTESTANT CHURCH,
COMPRISING THE
48800rATED METHODIST CHURCHES.
This is the youngest daughter of the antichristian family; one of
the most liberal and democratic of all.
The Methodist Episcopal church has 567,568 member*, and 2,230
priests* besides 159 superannuated. The priests of the Methodist Episcopal
church, call themselves *'thc divinely authorized expounders of
Gospel docttines, ordinances and mom I discipline!" We believe there
are many other shades of Methodism too numerous to mention.
Having thus descended to tho minor twigs of the t>»glish branch
of the Mystery of Iniquity, we shall now proceed to trace out the
several principal ramifi ations of
ΠΙ. T H E GENEVES Ε BRANCH OF T H E APOSTACY.

PURITANS

PURITANS.
The Reformers who took refuge in Germany, may be said to have
originated this schism from the Church of England. To show the
spirit of Lutheranism,it is sufficient to observe, thai they who were just
delivered from persecution themselves,expelled the English refugees
from many of their towns, and denied them hospitality; and for no
other reason than because they denied the real presence of tho body
and blood of Jesus in the bread and wine. Many, however, found
an asylum at Frankfort, where they fell out among themselves. On
their return U> England, they imported their disputes with them, and
6ndmg tho people's minds in a prepared state, they propagated their
advetse and peculiar theologies with great rapidity and success. The
more violent among them demanded the denatiocaltzing of the religion
of England; but when they became legislators themselves in the
New Ent/l&nd colony· they erected their own opinions into a system
tantamount to an establishment. The wilder and inoro moderate
amon£ them desired only liberty of conscience, with the privilege of
celebrating their own-.worship in their own way. Elizabeth listened
to neither party; but determined to coerce them into obedience, which
neither she, nor any of her successors have been ablo to do: but on
the contrary, the religion she set up bids fair to be abrogated by
their descendants, Thi» controversy wae not carriei on with excessive
animosity and zeal until 1588. when the fiamo broke out with redoubled
fury. Bancroft, Archbishop of Canterbury, assencd 'hat the Episcopal
order was superior to the bod ν of Ptesbyters, by virtue of djvine
appointment. To sustain this,the High Commissioners asserted that
the Church of ilnme was a true church, though corrupt and erroneous
in many points of doctrine and government. This doctrine the Fame
church maintains to the present day, since they could not otherwise etaim tike honor of deriving the Episcopal dignity by the "procession
of the Holy Ghost," in tn uninterrupted stream from the Apost!es9
days!! This fact fairlj establishes the connexion between the f'apal
and Protestant Horns of the Beast with the horns of a I amb, and
that spoke like a dragon. The Puritans stoutly denied the assumption,
but their descendants appear to have fallen in with the idea, and
to claim apostolicity to themselves. Had these religionists been united,
they would have been formidable, but their sentiments, views and
measures were quite otherwise, and this large and heterogeneous body
was suddenly divided into a variety of sects, of which some spread
abroad the delusions of fanaticism, which had turned their own brains,
white others displayed their folly in inventing new and whimsical plans
of church government.
Of ail these seots, the most famous was that which was formed
about the year 1581, known by the name of
BROWNISTS.
The founder of this sect was one Robert Brown, an insinuating man,
but unsettled, inconsistent, inconstant. In doctrine, he did not differ
much from the Puritans or the church He discarded all societies but
his own; and protested against the Church of England as a spurious
church, whose ministers were unlawfully ordained, whose discipline
was Popish and antichristtan. and whose sacraments and institutions
were destitute of all efficacy and virtue. AM of which is perfectly
true. Persecuted in England, the Brownists fled to the Netherlands,
where they founded churches. Their founder renounced hie tenets,
returned to England, and obtained a benefice. The Puritan txiloe,
his followers, some of whom had settled at Ley den, dispersed in the
year 1595; and it is to be noticed, that some of the members of
this church, transplanted themselves to America and laid the founda*"
lion of the colony of Now England. Others followed from the same
quarter in 1620, and settled at iNew Plymouth. Nine years after, their
Bombers were augmented by a second emigration from England, and
by a third in 1633. Out of the Brownists1 principles arose the
ENGLISH INDEPENDENTS AND THE AMERICAN CONGREGATION
A LISTS.

THE ENGLISH BRANCH OF THE APOSTACY.



THE ENGLISH BRANCH OF THE APOSTACY.

But to return from these days to which we have descended through the Lutheran line of the dposiacy, let us rttraet our steps to the era

at which the consumption of the Law lets One began It will easily

be perceived, that it was the spirit of his mouth, by which the Lord

Jesus was consuming him, when it is remembered that these convulsions

in the Kingdom of the Clergy were mainly attributable to the

circulation of the Holy Scriptures in the languages of rhe cifferent

nations. 1 he Hible was rendered into the German, Dutch, Swedish,

Danish, French, and English, besides several others. Ί he people read

them with avidity. The light of truth dispelled the darkness of their

minds ta some extent. They saw the gross absurdity of the superstition

they had received from their ancestors, and they felt the grinding despotism

of the clerical yoke. But they did not withal discover the impossibility

of national being the true religiou of Jesus. Their crafty

oppressors bad the sagacity to discern the invincible character of the

new opinions, when opposed by the ancient superstition; and displayed

profound policy in preserving their dominion to a certain extent, by

falling in with the new measures. For the most part they sided with

royalty. When kings resisted th« reforming innovations of the times,

the clergy seconded their views; when they favored them, the clergy

did tho same. This class of men, as α body, have generally proved

recreant to principle, but staunch to the interests of time. Exceptions

have occurred, but these only establish the rule. The history of the

Apo tacy in England sufficiently illustrates this position. When

John Wickliffe a ose in that country, A. D. 136u\ and attacked the

monks, the Pontifical power, and other ecclesiastical vices and abuses,

lie became the object of their inveterate hate, and persecution, and

15

would have assuredly expiated his "heresy" on their bloody altars,

But Wickliffe was patronized by John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster,

and other noblemen, and thus escaped the grasp of their hypocrital

and execrable tyranny. From this era may be dated the dawn of religious

liberty in England. Had Wickliffe been patronized by the king*

as Luther was by the princes of Germany, we should have hcaid

more of the Rector of Lutterworth, than of the Augustin, Friar of

Eiselben. But the period for the grand revolt had not yet arrived;

howbett, England, Bohemia, Hungary, and other parts of Europe,

were rilled with the doctrines of Wickliffe before Luther was born.

Thus was the train laid for that explosion, which afterwards occur·

red in England, when the pillars of Papal despotism were shaken to

their foundation, by an event which did not seem, at first, to promise

such important results. Henry VHf, a man of the most detestable

character, was the chief agent in this revolution. This Kinir—the

uxorious Henry—the murderer of hie wives, was styled by his "Holy

Father," the "Defender of the Faith?' because ho had maintained the

doctrines of the "Sevon Sacraments" in opposition to Luther. The

faith ho defended was the faith of Rom nism, which he afterward*

labored might and main, to destroy in some of its relation?; nevcrthe·

less, his royal successors, who founded tho present sprite faith, primi*

tive order and Scriptural liturgy" of the Episcopal Church, assumed

the same title, and wear it atiih Not long after he had been declared

champion of the Faith, Henry quarrelled with the Roman Pontiff,

Clement VI!.,-and set up for tkSupreme Head of the Church" in his

own dominions; and thus, the English nation was transferred from

the tyranny ot the "Inngc of tlit Hcast"— the POPE—to that of ONB

of his Ten Worm—their King. He suppressed the monasteries, and

applied their revenues- to State and other purposes; yet he still considered

himself as master of the religious sentiments of his subjects.

Hence religion wss continually changing during his reign, floeu*

perstitiously retained the greater part of tha Reman Mystery, with

its imperious and persecuting ppirit; and frequently presented the

terrors of death to those who differed from him. fie caused Bilney,

Bay man, the famous Tyndal, 14 Anabaptists, and many other?, to

expiate their ''heresies" at the burning stake; and even struck with

terror tho conforming priests. Thomas Cranmer· Archbishop of Canterbury,

was his favorite, and the great Apostle of his master, after

the downfall of Cardinal Wolsey. What can we think of a clergyman.

notwithstanding1 all the eulogies passed upon him by hie admirers

who could continue the favorite of such a savage monster as Henry

VIII.? He was useful in his day in facilitating the growth of the

Protestant Horn of the "Two HORNED BEAST," which with all its

"LamVMike pretensions speaks with the voice of a Dragon, (Rev. xiii.

11.) A hint to the wise is enough; we shall pursue this idea hereafter*

Henry, who had retarded rat her than promoted the establishment

of the neic opinions in England, died in 1547. He was succeeded by

Edward VI during whoso short reigrn, Protestantism advanced considerably.

He invited Martin Duccr, and Paul Fagius from the

continent. Under the influence and instructions of Cranmer, he

endeavored to purge his country from ι he vile fictions of popery, and

to establish what Episcopalians call, the pure doctrines of Christianity,

in their place. John Calvin also, despairing of the Protestant cause in

Germany, aud assuming the authority of an Apostle, tendered his ter •ices to Cranmer· in a letter; suggesting new regulations for the church.

Cranmer, however, declining, the Geneves© reformer, next addressed

btiheelf to the Protector Somerset, whom he prevailed on to obtain

for him considerable influence, in the revision of the Liturgy which

was soon after undertaken· Thus the seeds of A'lgustinism, revived in

Calvinism, for which» says Lord Chatham, "diabolism would be a

better name '—were introduced into the National Religion; and afterwards

distributed among the leading factions, which split ciffrom the

establishment. This young king died 1553, before he could accom*

plish fully his designs. His sister the bigotted and bloodthirsty Mary*

^legitimatized by her fatherV divorce from Catharine of Arragon,

acceded to the crown. She had now a fair opportunity to wreak her

vengeance on her mothers enemies, which she did not fail to improve.

8he burned 277 persons during her reign; and among these the Archbishop

himself· It is usual with Protestant writers to eulogize this

arch prelate as a martyr for the truth equal to any of the primitive

age· 1 look at the whole affair in a very d ι He rent light, (-ranraer,

it ie admitted, possessed some laudable peculiarities; but it must be

recollected that a man may be a martyr fur his opinions without,

therefore, being a martyr for the truth. Tho Apostles were martyrs

for the truth; but the Protestant martyrs were such only for their

opinion 9. During the war of S male aid tene of thousands fell, righting

ill the cause of Protestantism and human liberty. But shall we say

that they were martyrs for Jesus? Besides, Cranmer, the martyr of

English Episcopacy, is less in-tilled to the compassion bestowed upon

him than is generally supposed; for. when in power, he followed the

execrable cxampU of the Romanists, by committing to the flames,

against the will of King Edward, two supposed heretics, two unfortunate

foreigners, whom, one would have supposed, humanity would

have spared, and whose destruction nothing could justify. Should

we not rather say, in justice to the memory of these murdered exiles,

that retributive justice had overtaken the arch primate at last; than

to celebrate his praise as a paragon of Christian virtue? lie had the

horns of a lamb, but he spoke like a dragon.

Mary restored her realm to the jurisdiction of the Pope. Her despotic

reign, however* was happily a short one. Siiu died, leaving no

issue, 1558. Elizabeth succeeded. She br%ke anew the despotic

joke of Papa] authority and superstition. This ''illustrious and pious

princess" was a perfect viiago. Her familiar spirit was the demon of

persecution, transmitted to her by regal descent. If any one refused

to worship God according to her appointment* ho was cast into prison

» where many exellent men wete left to perish. She burned two

BrowniFts, and two Anabaptists: in short, her hands were stained with

the blood both of Papists and Puritans. Such are some of the acts

of this "Christian" lady, who consummated and established upon its

present basis, the "pure faith, primitive order% and Scriptural liturgy"

Of the

NATIONAL EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF ENGLAND.

Let my readers lake a review of tho period we have sketched;

namely, from Henry's quarrel with the Pope, down to the feign of

Elizabeth—and let them candidly and ingenuously confers if the

Episcopal Church arising out of, and constituted of such elements as

therein developed can have any pretensions to the character of a

17

Church of Christ. It is founded in human gore, watered with it, and

sustained by it at the present time· Look at Ireland· The tear· of

widows and of orphans; tho criej of oppression ascend ing from the

woods and forests of America—the whizzing Ush and the cracking

thongs, with which the Baptist*» were scourged in these colonies—al·

cry aloud for judgment on this splendid daughter of Babylon. Yes,

her consumption has long since began, and her utter destruction is at

the door. The former is coeval with her establishment. For though

Elizabeth, her foster-mother, passed la**e to compel all men to belong

to this cqmmunion; the spirit of English liberty was too elastic to be

subdued. Although great numbers of the clergy still lived * ho sha ped

their religion to the times, there were ethers who could not conceive

what right the Queen had to set up her opiniona as a standard of the

faith, and practice of her subject;. Elizabeth, ever fond of parade,

preferred a pplendid to a simple form of worship, and, therefore,

retained the gew gaws of tho clerical dress, besides other obnoxious

papal observances. This caused great di>content amon^ great η urn··

hers of her subjects, which was fermented by many of the reformers,

who now returned fnm Germany, to wtiich they had fled for safety

and fur succor during the Marian persecution. Multitudes refused to

attend at the churches where the popish habits and ceremonies were

used; the clergy, who conformed, were treated with contempt; and

from the superior purity, and simplicity of the "will-worship" they

adhered to, they obtained the name of

PURITANS.

NATIONAL EPISCOPAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF DENMARK

NATIONAL EPISCOPAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF DENMARK.
Tn the establishment of tbo«o two churches the bishops were deprived
of their honors privileges, and possession*, of which, the last were
acquired by tho most perfidious stratagem». They posseted enormous
poJssions in wealth, castto·. fortified towns; so that heir
suppression was a» affair of great political importance to the lungs aob2e*,and people. In the room of the bishops, Chrisliern HI created
mn order ot* men» with the denomination of suptrinlendants, who performed
the spiritual part of the Episcopal office without the least
shadow of temporal authority. Lutheramsm, as well as all the other
teligions of Europe, exists in the United btates in a denationalized
Ibrm. It was established in this country in 1743, under the name of the
LUTHERAN EVANGELICAL CHURCH OF THE UNITED STATES.
A nobleman and son of the Lutheran Church of Sweden, emerged
from tho region* of the noith, and set up a church of a new description.
His name was Emanuel •Sweder.borg; a visionary fanatic, yet
not too visionary υr fanatical to gain converts from tho worshippers
of the Beast. His opinions are too absurd, insignificant, and con·
temptibie to mention» further than to shew to what a ciimax of folly
the human mind wiii aspire*. Ho dates the origin of his church
from the year 1757; and pretends that his scheme is the commencement
of a new Christian Church, called in the Apocalypse

THE NEW JERUSALEM CHURCH.
The society is also known by the name Swedenborgian. They are
•rgantzed in this couniry into a general convention, consisting of
pastors, teachers, and lay delegates. They have 29 clergymen. It
wou/d he a gt>od thing had the other sects no more. Ί he* are said
to use a liturgy, and instrumental as well as vocal music in their
worship. Their founder died in fellowship with the Lutheran Church.

The Donatists

The Donatists

The Donatists were a very numerous body in the Roman Africa, and, indeed, seem to have been almost as multitudinous there as the catholics themselves, which, considering the strictness of their discipline and their firm adhesion to the laws of Christ’s house, is gratifying to contemplate. There was scarcely a city or town in the Roman Africa in which there was not an ecclesia of these believers. A public conference was held at Carthage, A.D. 411, at which 286 bishops belonging to the catholics were present, and of the Donatists 279; and when we take into account, not only their rigid discipline, but also that they were a proscribed sect, and frequently the subjects of severe and sanguinary persecution from the catholic rulers, there is good reason to conclude that we have before us in the Donatists the very people foreshadowed in the servants to be sealed. They must have been energized by an enlightened faith, which gave them an intellectual and moral superiority over the imbecile and drowsy sacramentalists of the time. Their increasing numbers attracted the attention of the authorities, who were anxious, if possible, to conciliate them, and form a union between them and the catholics. The emperor Constans, A.D. 348, ten or a dozen years after the death of his father, Constantine, deputed two persons of rank to try to bring about a reconciliation between the two parties. When it was urged upon them that it was their duty to study the peace of the church and to avoid schism, they urged the unscriptural nature of the alliance which had recently taken place between church and state. "Quid est imperatori cum ecclesia?" said they -- in plain English, "What hath the emperor to do with the church?" A more important and pertinent question could not have been propounded. Had civil rulers known their proper sphere, they would have accorded protection to citizens in all their rights, and have left them to their own convictions in matters of faith and practice. The civil powers would then have restrained all ecclesiastics within the spheres of their own pales; and we should have had no "Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots, and Abominations of the earth." The atrocities of the Roman Church would not have soaked the soil with the blood of the saints and witnesses of Jesus for hundreds of years, until she became drunk with their gore. Little was Constantine aware of the consequences that would follow his conferring wealth, and honour, and power upon the bishops, presbyters, and so forth, of the Laodicean Apostasy, which, in the ignorance of all concerned, was mistaken for the Spouse of Christ. Could he have foreseen the racks, the fires, the massacres, the butcheries, that were to follow his misplaced liberality, he would, doubtless, have thrilled with horror and disgust at the iniquity he had unwittingly evoked.